Essence of Revolution!
Athar Mudasir Wahid.
Revolution by its very nature
signifies a systematic change in
nature of
existing phenomena of a state by a
considerable influence of a person
or
people on the basis of certain
fundamental or right integrative
demand
which ultimately in certain cases
change the very nature. Revolution
is
derived from latin ‘’REVOLUTIO’’
means a turnaround; thus
signifies from
its vary nature a fundamental
change in power or organizational
structure
that takes place in relatively short
period of time and vary widely in
terms of methods, durations,
motivating, ideology and
perception. The
outcome of an idea into
movement considerably pertain
into major changes in
economical, and social-political
institutions and serve the main
factors to
trigger Revolution where they are
been altered including cultural
aspects.
The origin of literal word as
Revolution originated from Europe
so it was
considered European aspect of
history but De facto human History
has a long
Historical and persistent
significances of resistance and
ultimately
perceives to Revolution by nature.
Revolution is a process where an
intellectual and leader conceive an
idea and keeping work to give it a
face
of movement which is likely to
pertain objectivity. It’s necessary
to
analyse the dynamic considerable
essence elements to Revolution
which are
likely to its success or failure;;
trigger an Idea into Movement !
The Causes of Revolutions
Enlightenment Ideas – the idea and
perception
regarding to notion that things
might be different if the
operations and
goings would had been conducted
by such notion of conceiver; he/
she
conceive it by his own cognition or
derives it from other which are
apparently similar to conceivers
notion or where such presumes
any notion
familiar to his accord. The change
cant be done unless there is an
Idea for
which actions are ascertained. The
world has witnessed a cradle of
Revolutions. (The following list thus
looks at situations where, in one or
more regions of the world-system,
there have been roughly
simultaneous
revolutionary situations in multiple
locations which were not simply
part
of a single set of arrangements of
ethnicities and states (France and
Belgium, Greece and Crete) but
between which there were genuine
links and
connections of whatever kind (as
against Nicaragua and Iran).
Obviously
exact periodisation is inherently
controversial so the dates given
here are
simply by way of indication.
– § The Atlantic Revolutions of
the late 18th century (notably the
American and French revolutions,
the Haitian revolution, the Batavian
revolution of 1795 and the 1798
uprising in Ireland).
– § The early 19th century Latin
American wars of independence –
sometimes seen as a second
wave of the Atlantic Revolutions.
– § The failed liberal revolutions
of the early 1820s in Spain,
Portugal, Naples and Russia,
together with the Greek wars of
independence.
– § The European revolutions of
1848.
– § The democratic revolutions
of the early 20th century (c.
1905-10),
including the Mexican Revolution,
the 1905 revolution in Russia, the
revolution of the Young Turks,
the establishment of the
Portuguese
republic, the constitutional
revolution in Persia and the failed
Argentinian revolution of 1905.
– § The revolutionary period in
Europe from 1916 – 1924, which
saw the
establishment of the Irish Free
State, Weimar Germany and the
USSR, the
collapse of three empires and a
wave of revolutionary situations
among many
other events.
– § The anti-fascist resistance in
Europe from c. 1943 and the Asian
cycle which saw anti-colonial
movements, resistance to
Japanese occupation
and forced decolonisation,
handing power to a mixture of
nationalist and
socialist / communist
movements.
– § Other post-war anti-imperial
struggles are highly complex and
contested, but at least some
anticolonial struggles in Africa from
the
1950s up to the end of
apartheid, some aspects of post-
war Arab nationalism
and some guerrilla struggles in
Latin America might be understood
in terms
of revolutionary waves.
– § The revolutions of 1989,
including events in Soviet Central
Asia,
the failed Chinese revolution of
1989 and events in Soviet client
states
elsewhere. “Colour revolutions”
in early 21st century Ukraine,
Georgia and
Kyrgyzstan are sometimes linked
to this. § Returning to the starting
point,
the global justice movement
(whether starting in Chiapas in
1994 or in
Seattle in 1999, including events
across the Americas, in western
Europe
and south Africa, in Oceania and
to an extent in India, and including
the
anti-war protests of 2003)
moves via Latin American “pink
tide” and west
European movement continuity
into the contemporary events of
anti-austerity
protest, “Arab Spring” and
Occupy. )1
(Laurence Cox, National University
of Ireland Maynooth)1Thus what it signifies the want of
people to lead a change in hope of
better future. But apparently the
matter is people wouldn’t sacrifice
there
present or lives for a leaders
perception but for hope which is
been
projected by leader, so an Idea
must be viable and shall also
closely touch
the social-moral and interest of
people to be successful otherwise
it will
lead inverse consequences and get
simulated or vanished. As above
stated
revolutions there was an persistent
and dynamic philosophy and
process of
mobilizing group into common
concern.
Oppression and exploitation by
power in dominance To conceive
and develop
the idea of resistance there must
be apparently an aggressor,
oppressor,
and exploitation of people at large.
It’s also been witnessed that
sometimes the resistance occurs
due to not by any aggression,
oppression
and exploitation but raises due to
difference in social-cultural and
communal basis. These elements
as aggressor, oppressor, and
exploitation
creates an anger within the people
and who are always in will to get
off
from such reign which had made
their lives worst; as most of people
present
in resistance.
Oppression directly creates an
essence to revolt and endeavor to
overthrow
the ruler while as exploitation
pertains to conceive an idea
among some
intellectual persons by comparative
integration which withhold an
anti-governmental agenda and
pertains to change with new set of
institution
with a strong and ideal notion.
The leader try to show the
negative aspects and accumulates
all the undue
and arbitrary acts of state to make
people conscious about there
enemy.
When the enemy is projected the
2nd phase of triggering the
movement is
necessary . most of times the
state gives a way to trigger
movement and
then put more fuel by stopping
and dragging the protestors which
makes
certain death and injuries to mob.
This later serves the key factor to
run
down the state.
Economic distress and exploitation
Where the state prolong any set of
rules,instititions,procedures which
are likely arbitrary to interest of
people and relatively make people
exploited. The people resist or
protest
against state to withdraw them.
The world has witness one of most
influencing revolution on such
distress and provides essence to
Marxism and
beside there are other nation like
united states prior to declaration of
independence was colonized and
exploited nation by British. thus it
signifies that where people are not
satisfied and are overburdened by
the
state people will resist considerably
whenever there is a position or
space
to resist.
The excessive burden of tax which
people feel as oppression on their
economic or even which create
lucid on the basic necessassities
of
livelihood.
Ever since the dawn of civilization
man asocial animal has lived
together
and as by nature also enriched a
person as there head which later
by mass
growth of civilization became
rulers and kings, today such have
grown to
huge extent to nations and
sovereigns.
Social Injustice by government
directly or indirectly to a specified
or
whole nation creates a chaos in
people which ultimately gives
essence to
Revolt. When people are been
treated in bad manner and are
given a
privilege in and rights people
become angry against Government
and its
agencies.
Religious Intolerance – where a
specified religion is been outcaste
or is
not given right to profess r
arbitrary in there practice give the
most
influential revolution in world
because people when being
abused on faith
they become more violent than
any other matter because here
consideration I
nothing but fight and struggle in a
cause of divinity.
Nationalism –this provide a pride
sprit of being designated to
specific
region, country or nation creating
an entheausim and literal right to
be
free or rule other.
Therefore a leader or revolutionary
personnel must keep an cater a
systematic assumption while in
process of Revolution.
Athar Mudasir Wahid.
Revolution by its very nature
signifies a systematic change in
nature of
existing phenomena of a state by a
considerable influence of a person
or
people on the basis of certain
fundamental or right integrative
demand
which ultimately in certain cases
change the very nature. Revolution
is
derived from latin ‘’REVOLUTIO’’
means a turnaround; thus
signifies from
its vary nature a fundamental
change in power or organizational
structure
that takes place in relatively short
period of time and vary widely in
terms of methods, durations,
motivating, ideology and
perception. The
outcome of an idea into
movement considerably pertain
into major changes in
economical, and social-political
institutions and serve the main
factors to
trigger Revolution where they are
been altered including cultural
aspects.
The origin of literal word as
Revolution originated from Europe
so it was
considered European aspect of
history but De facto human History
has a long
Historical and persistent
significances of resistance and
ultimately
perceives to Revolution by nature.
Revolution is a process where an
intellectual and leader conceive an
idea and keeping work to give it a
face
of movement which is likely to
pertain objectivity. It’s necessary
to
analyse the dynamic considerable
essence elements to Revolution
which are
likely to its success or failure;;
trigger an Idea into Movement !
The Causes of Revolutions
Enlightenment Ideas – the idea and
perception
regarding to notion that things
might be different if the
operations and
goings would had been conducted
by such notion of conceiver; he/
she
conceive it by his own cognition or
derives it from other which are
apparently similar to conceivers
notion or where such presumes
any notion
familiar to his accord. The change
cant be done unless there is an
Idea for
which actions are ascertained. The
world has witnessed a cradle of
Revolutions. (The following list thus
looks at situations where, in one or
more regions of the world-system,
there have been roughly
simultaneous
revolutionary situations in multiple
locations which were not simply
part
of a single set of arrangements of
ethnicities and states (France and
Belgium, Greece and Crete) but
between which there were genuine
links and
connections of whatever kind (as
against Nicaragua and Iran).
Obviously
exact periodisation is inherently
controversial so the dates given
here are
simply by way of indication.
– § The Atlantic Revolutions of
the late 18th century (notably the
American and French revolutions,
the Haitian revolution, the Batavian
revolution of 1795 and the 1798
uprising in Ireland).
– § The early 19th century Latin
American wars of independence –
sometimes seen as a second
wave of the Atlantic Revolutions.
– § The failed liberal revolutions
of the early 1820s in Spain,
Portugal, Naples and Russia,
together with the Greek wars of
independence.
– § The European revolutions of
1848.
– § The democratic revolutions
of the early 20th century (c.
1905-10),
including the Mexican Revolution,
the 1905 revolution in Russia, the
revolution of the Young Turks,
the establishment of the
Portuguese
republic, the constitutional
revolution in Persia and the failed
Argentinian revolution of 1905.
– § The revolutionary period in
Europe from 1916 – 1924, which
saw the
establishment of the Irish Free
State, Weimar Germany and the
USSR, the
collapse of three empires and a
wave of revolutionary situations
among many
other events.
– § The anti-fascist resistance in
Europe from c. 1943 and the Asian
cycle which saw anti-colonial
movements, resistance to
Japanese occupation
and forced decolonisation,
handing power to a mixture of
nationalist and
socialist / communist
movements.
– § Other post-war anti-imperial
struggles are highly complex and
contested, but at least some
anticolonial struggles in Africa from
the
1950s up to the end of
apartheid, some aspects of post-
war Arab nationalism
and some guerrilla struggles in
Latin America might be understood
in terms
of revolutionary waves.
– § The revolutions of 1989,
including events in Soviet Central
Asia,
the failed Chinese revolution of
1989 and events in Soviet client
states
elsewhere. “Colour revolutions”
in early 21st century Ukraine,
Georgia and
Kyrgyzstan are sometimes linked
to this. § Returning to the starting
point,
the global justice movement
(whether starting in Chiapas in
1994 or in
Seattle in 1999, including events
across the Americas, in western
Europe
and south Africa, in Oceania and
to an extent in India, and including
the
anti-war protests of 2003)
moves via Latin American “pink
tide” and west
European movement continuity
into the contemporary events of
anti-austerity
protest, “Arab Spring” and
Occupy. )1
(Laurence Cox, National University
of Ireland Maynooth)1Thus what it signifies the want of
people to lead a change in hope of
better future. But apparently the
matter is people wouldn’t sacrifice
there
present or lives for a leaders
perception but for hope which is
been
projected by leader, so an Idea
must be viable and shall also
closely touch
the social-moral and interest of
people to be successful otherwise
it will
lead inverse consequences and get
simulated or vanished. As above
stated
revolutions there was an persistent
and dynamic philosophy and
process of
mobilizing group into common
concern.
Oppression and exploitation by
power in dominance To conceive
and develop
the idea of resistance there must
be apparently an aggressor,
oppressor,
and exploitation of people at large.
It’s also been witnessed that
sometimes the resistance occurs
due to not by any aggression,
oppression
and exploitation but raises due to
difference in social-cultural and
communal basis. These elements
as aggressor, oppressor, and
exploitation
creates an anger within the people
and who are always in will to get
off
from such reign which had made
their lives worst; as most of people
present
in resistance.
Oppression directly creates an
essence to revolt and endeavor to
overthrow
the ruler while as exploitation
pertains to conceive an idea
among some
intellectual persons by comparative
integration which withhold an
anti-governmental agenda and
pertains to change with new set of
institution
with a strong and ideal notion.
The leader try to show the
negative aspects and accumulates
all the undue
and arbitrary acts of state to make
people conscious about there
enemy.
When the enemy is projected the
2nd phase of triggering the
movement is
necessary . most of times the
state gives a way to trigger
movement and
then put more fuel by stopping
and dragging the protestors which
makes
certain death and injuries to mob.
This later serves the key factor to
run
down the state.
Economic distress and exploitation
Where the state prolong any set of
rules,instititions,procedures which
are likely arbitrary to interest of
people and relatively make people
exploited. The people resist or
protest
against state to withdraw them.
The world has witness one of most
influencing revolution on such
distress and provides essence to
Marxism and
beside there are other nation like
united states prior to declaration of
independence was colonized and
exploited nation by British. thus it
signifies that where people are not
satisfied and are overburdened by
the
state people will resist considerably
whenever there is a position or
space
to resist.
The excessive burden of tax which
people feel as oppression on their
economic or even which create
lucid on the basic necessassities
of
livelihood.
Ever since the dawn of civilization
man asocial animal has lived
together
and as by nature also enriched a
person as there head which later
by mass
growth of civilization became
rulers and kings, today such have
grown to
huge extent to nations and
sovereigns.
Social Injustice by government
directly or indirectly to a specified
or
whole nation creates a chaos in
people which ultimately gives
essence to
Revolt. When people are been
treated in bad manner and are
given a
privilege in and rights people
become angry against Government
and its
agencies.
Religious Intolerance – where a
specified religion is been outcaste
or is
not given right to profess r
arbitrary in there practice give the
most
influential revolution in world
because people when being
abused on faith
they become more violent than
any other matter because here
consideration I
nothing but fight and struggle in a
cause of divinity.
Nationalism –this provide a pride
sprit of being designated to
specific
region, country or nation creating
an entheausim and literal right to
be
free or rule other.
Therefore a leader or revolutionary
personnel must keep an cater a
systematic assumption while in
process of Revolution.
